TINDAK LANJUT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI OLEH DPR RI

Topane Gayus Lumbuun

Abstract

One of the power of the Constitutional Court (MK) is to examine
the laws under the Constitution regarding its substance or the
contents of the laws as well as procedural aspect of the law
making. The MK power can be categorized as a negativelegislation from the perspective of legislation of laws, because
it can revoke the laws if such laws are in contradiction with
1945 Indonesian Constitution. Therefore, the MK judgment
revoking the norms in contradiction to the 1945 Indonesia
Constitution is binding and final. With such final and binding
in nature, there is no legal appeal which can be done to
challenge of MK judgment’s. Follow up of such judgment, is
the positive legislation held jointly by the President and the
DPR. Then, the problem is that MK judgments do not
automatically receive response from DPR for its amendment or
its revision as mandated by MK. Practically and in its
implementation, DPR has not implemented the MK judgment
and as such the execution of MK’s judgment is not as easy as it
seems. There are two important factors for DPR in conducting
legislative review. The first relates to the controversies contained
in thse substance of MK’s judgment . Secondly relates to the
mechanism and submission structure of draft laws to DPR which
should be planned and integrated scheme of national legislation
programmes.

Keywords

substance of laws; negative legislation; positive legislation; legislative review

Full Text:

PDF

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimmly. Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar

Demokrasi, Seprihan Pemikiran Hukum,

Konstitusi, Konstitusi Press, 2005.

——————. Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai

Negara, Konstitusi Press, 2006.Republik Indonesia,

Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan Pengujian terhadap

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2002 tentang

Ketenagalistrikan No. 001/PUU-I/2003 dan No. 022/

PUU-I/2003 tanggal 15-12-2004.

——————. Putusan pengujian terhadap Undang-Undang

Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi,

/PUU- I/2004, tanggal 21-12-2004.

——————. Putusan yang terkait dengan Pengadilan Tindak

Pidana Korupsi (Tipikor) dalam Perkaran No. 012- 016-

/PUU-IV/2006.

——————. Putusan Perkara No Perkara : 066/PUU-II/2004

mengenai pengujian terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor

Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1987 tentang Kamar

Dagang & Industri terhadap UUD 1945.

——————. Lima Tahun Penegakan Konstitusi, Gambaran Singkat

Pelaksanaan Tugas Mahkamah Konstitusi 2003-2008,

Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah

Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2008.

Vanberg, .George Vanberg dalam The Politics of Constitutional

Review in Germany, Political Economy of Institutions and

Decision, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v6i3.329