HATI-HATI ANCAMAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDSOS DALAM UU ITE NOMER 11 TAHUN 2008

Yogi Prasetyo

Abstract

The purpose of writing is to provide an understanding to the public about the susceptibility of being caught in the crime of defamation in the electronic transaction information law, so that in carrying out their activities on social media, they must be careful. So that people are free from the trap of criminal defamation on social media. People who have carried out many activities on social media must understand in depth the contents of the offenses contained in the electronic transaction information law which are prone to legal threats. In this paper, we use a normative legal study method that understands law as a positive legal system in statutory regulations. While the approach used is legal philosophy. The main materials used in this study are laws and regulations and other legal materials that support the theme of the study. The analysis was carried out descriptively to obtain a general description of the legal issues being studied. The results showed that there were several legal problems committed by someone who could be classified as a criminal act of defamation, so that they could be threatened with the electronic transaction information law

 

Keywords

criminal, defamation, electronic transaction information law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aida Ashouri, 2014, “Caleb Bowers and Cherrie Warden, An Overview of the Use of Digital Evidence in International Criminal Courts,” Digital Evidence and Elektronic Signature Law Review, No.11.

Amanda Ngomane. R, 2010, The Use of Electronic Evidence in Forensic Investigation. Africa: University of South Africa.

Anton Bakker, et.al, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Anton Hendrik, 2017, “Membanding Perbuatan yang Dilarang dalam UU ITE dan Konvensi lnternasional: Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Siber.” Jurnal Argumentum, Vol.2, No.1.

Barda Nawawi, 1996, Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Prenata, Jakarta.

Busro Muqadas, 1989, Nilai dan Berbagai Aspek dalam Hukum Suatu Pengantar Studi Filsafat Hukum, Bhratara Niaga Media, Jakarta.

Fredesvinda Insa, 2007, “The Admisibility of Elektronic Evidence in Court (AEEC): Fightin against High Tech Crime-Results of a European Study,” Journal of Digital Forensik Practice, 1. 4.

Handrini Ardiyanti, 2014, “Cyber-Security Dan Tantangan Pengembangannya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Politica, Vol.5, No.1.

Johnny Ibrahim, 2005, Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang.

Judge Awarness, 2010, Understanding and Application of Digital Evidence. Southeastern: Gary Craig Kessler, Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences, Nova Southeastern University.

Khudzaifah Dimyati, 2014, Pemikiran Hukum; Kontruksi Epistemologis Berbasis Budaya Hukum Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Rif’ah Roihannah, 2015, “Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia: Sebuah harapan dan Kenyataan.” Jurnal Justicia Islamica, Vol.12, No.1.

Soetandyo Wignjosoebrot, 2002, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Masalah, ELSAM & HUMA, Jakarta.

Sri Warjiyati, 2018, “Instrumen Hukum Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia” Jurnal Justicia Islamica. Vol.15, No.1.

Supanto, 2016, “Perkembangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) dan Antisipasinya dengan Penalpolicy.” Jurnal Yustisia, Vol.5, No.1.

Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono, 2012, Analisis situasi Penerapan Hukum Penghinaan di Indonesia, ICIR-TIFA, Jakarta.

Yahyanto, 2019, “Kontribusi Pemikiran Hak Asasi ManusiaTerhadap Pembaruan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal Justicia Islamica. Vol.16, No.2.

Yogi Prasetyo, 2017, “Legal Truth (Menakar Kebenaran Hukum),” Jurnal Legal Standing, Vol.1, No.1.